MP Babu Owino faults President Ruto for 'shielding' Sakaja from impeachment

A photo collage of President William Ruto, Embakasi East MP Babu Owino, and Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja. | COURTESY

Audio By Vocalize
Embakasi East Member of Parliament Babu Owino has accused President William Ruto of meddling in the Nairobi County Assembly’s oversight role, after a motion to impeach Governor Johnson Sakaja was suspended following interventions by the Head of State and ODM party leader Raila Odinga.
Owino argued that by blocking the
MCAs from proceeding with the motion, the President was undermining
accountability and shielding the Governor from legitimate scrutiny.
“Even if the MCAs were not given
anything, the Nairobi Governor is destroying the capital city county. As the President,
the MCAs are ready to kick him out of office. Why don’t you allow the MCAs to
do their work? Isn’t that supporting corruption?” Owino posed.
Owino dismissed calls for Sakaja
to be given more time to deliver, insisting that three years had already been
wasted under his leadership.
“For those trying to project the
Nairobi Governor saying he should be given more time, if he hasn’t been able to
do something for three years, he can’t do it in two years,” he said.
The Embakasi East lawmaker, who
has announced his bid for the Nairobi governorship in 2027, maintained that the
capital needs fresh leadership to restore order and development.
The impeachment motion, which cited alleged mismanagement and
poor service delivery in the city, was dropped this week after UDA MCAs were
summoned by President Ruto and their ODM counterparts by Raila Odinga.
ODM Ward Representatives put the
plan to impeach Governor Sakaja on hold for 30 days following Odinga’s intervention.
At State House, Nairobi,
President Ruto secured more wiggle room for the beleaguered Governor by persuading
UDA MCAs to work with him.
The MCAs
presented their concerns, which they said were sufficient to impeach Sakaja.
The ward representatives, who had already secured enough signatures, accused
the Governor of sidelining
them and implementing development projects without consultation.
They questioned
how the Ward Development Fund had been utilised, as well as the criteria used
to select projects and award bursaries in the county.
Leave a Comment